From June to August just 15 minutes outside is generally enough time”
Arthritis Research UK
Vitamin D is essential to help the body absorb calcium from food.
Low levels can result in serious problems with the health of our bones.
Alan Silman, medical director of Arthritis Research UK, said the advice was simple: “When the days are sunny, go out for a few minutes and expose your face and arms to the sunshine.”
But he also had a warning on overexposure: “Don’t allow your skin to go red, and take care not to burn, particularly in strong sunshine and if you have fair or sensitive skin.
“From June to August just 15 minutes is generally enough time.”
The sun’s UV levels are not yet strong enough over the UK for our bodies alone to make enough vitamin D.
He said: “In less sunny months, we recommend that people top up the vitamin D in their diet by eating more oily fish such as salmon, tuna, trout, mackerel, pilchards and sardines, and foods ‘fortified’ with vitamin D, such as breakfast cereals and some margarines.”
After being at St Pauls from day 1 of the Occupy LSX protest, you could tell something was’t right and something very fishy was being dealt with the chips and it wasn’t your usual Cod. First of all although i was right behind the people i didn’t like the word occupy, it seems to sound too much like I wanted to invade, to which means i am prepared to go to war and do battle against the corporation known as the United Kingdom. Put that aside and the first day went fairly well. The police were very much threatening without being threatening until the kettling started…..say that after a few glasses of wine.
Straight from the start you could tell who the leaders were going to be, i kept myself to myself and just wandered asking for interviews. For one i wanted them for my own little project, and for two i wanted them for TruthJuice and also one to go onto the suck-o network. Well like i said i was bemused at the way you could see the leadership forming but with people like Charlie Skelton who donated one of the marquees I was prepared to just sit back and wait to see what happens. Well duty called and i could only hang around for a few weeks when another character that i met a few months ago turned up. He asked if he could borrow my camcorder and stay and get some footage. We talked about the law and how we thought it was a good idea but the structure made it fail from the start. I must say it was very worth while leaving it with him.
Not so long ago we discovered that people like Saskia Kent were helping control the movement so we knew this went further than we realized. There were other paid activists too which are involved who also had direct contact with the BBC but we will go there another time. Commonly Known as Dom, Mark Windows, Malcolm from Anonymous (with some backing from his friends who remain nameless) all helped to reveal the Common Purpose Shill, most of the attempts to ‘out’ her were reacted against by her aptly named ‘Dragons’ as you can see from this video, except this time they failed!
So lets cut to the chase, we know about Saskia Kent and we know she is common purpose trained but there has got to be more, we discovered that Tavistock Institute were also hiding under the covers of darkness in disguise as another group in the name of Social Dreaming that just couldn’t wait to be able to come and use the penned in lab rats of the occupy movement.
None of the GA meetings or anything going on with the Bank of Ideas is going to help the people. These are controlled by facilitators who are trained in using the Delphi technique. This is very good for helping divert people from the real issues and helping focus on issues that are not really there……like the climate change scam. Really funny to understand why the money all got transferred to an account that has an agenda that is totally non conceivable. Still these questions haven’t been answered and still no-one is prepared to speak about the accounts. If you do ask questions they try to run you out of camp.
Recently I haven’t had much time to do any research but tonight i had a call from Dom, he basically said the same to me as he had posted on Facebook.
OCCUPY REAL PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO TAKE THE ORCHESTRATED OCCUPY MOVEMENT AWAY FROM THE HIDDEN CONTROLLING ELITES…
The occupy people at Finsbury sq, have had enough of being controlled by people who have self appointed them self’s in positions of control. Such as the finance, legal, and process team etc etc etc.
Now occupy has this smoke screen to cover up that CLIMATE CAMP have control of the money.
This is the occupy hidden hierarchy excuse for trying to shut down the movement NOW they have been exposed, for who they are.
ps i have all the unseen footage of what has been said at this weeks GA and finance meeting will upload asap….
watch this space.
After a while he called again and told me that the meeting had once again been diverted from the attention of what the people wanted and different agenda’s were followed which no-one wanted to discuss at that time. People wanted action and REAL action.
Dom sent me a link to to where the schedule was hosted and curiosity got the better of me and i did some simple but very legal searches on the domain name and here’s is what i come up with…
Interesting, i then decided to take a look at a few of these websites. Lets take a look at Occupy Factory.
Lets take a look at the next one. What? can you read that?, are my specs deceiving me?
To support the administration of a brain scanning research unit.
Is this for serious. Lets take a look at the others and are they linked to these websites, is there another connection?
OK lets take a look at the software DNS.
Ok so now this cant seriously get any worse for the people down at the occupy movent in London surely. Does that say what i think it does.
Lets take a look at Desire another section of their program
Desire serves two main purposes. Firstly, it provides an effective way of conducting, recording and presenting working processes, which are analysed in terms of events and the responses made to them. Based on such considerations, requirements for a software system can also be recorded and associated with the process responses which they support.
This analysis approach has been developed and practiced by the Appropriate Software Foundation, and has proven effective for numerous organisations.
The second purpose of the Desire service is to provide a shared space for circulating process analysis amongst civil society organisations. We offer Desire as a free service, and hope that it will be a valuable contribution to the development of communities of shared interest in civil society.
Holy shmoke, we new that covert operations had some clout but this takes the biscuit!!!
Lets take another look at Appropriate software…..
Yup definately a relationship there, what else is there i wonder…..keep looking, there cant be nothing else can there, i mean, looks a bit like there could be a bit of an issue but not much, is there????
Take a look at the original print on the software being used …..
Ok not much to see here move on move on……..wait a minute, does that say?
So I wonder why Occupy would want to use these?????
Has the Occupy movement in London been operated from the inside from day one? Well it certainly looks like it!!!
OK after having a little more time to dig round ‘google’ I did a little search on the owner of one of the domains that wasn’t hidden from prying eyes…..like mine. A simple search for the owner of the domain, a Mr John Bywater. Sometimes Google reveals a little more than people would like.
Anyone want to represent the team?
Begin forwarded message:
> From: OccupyLSX <occupylsx at gmail.com> > Subject: Occupy London One Month Anniversary! > Date: 14 November 2011 00:54:40 GMT > To: Joshua Virasami <joshuav90 at hotmail.co.uk>, jamie kelsey-fry <lsxcamp at gmail.com>, charlie at clactonfestival.com, "john.bywater at appropriatesoftwate.net" <john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net>, Virginia Lopez Calvo <virginialopezcalvo at googlemail.com>, Shimri <shimriz at gmail.com>, "artin.giles" <artin.giles at gmail.com>, hannahborno at yahoo.co.uk, hlmackie <hlmackie at hotmail.com>, Martin Dittus <martin at dekstop.de>, Martin Dittus <martind at screamorap.org>, peaceandloveforall at hotmail.co.uk, Mark Barrett <marknbarrett at googlemail.com>, Morellos <morellos at riseup.net> >> Hi all, >> On Tuesday, Occupy London will be one month old and a number of things will be happening on the day and throughout the week to mark the anniversary, including Occupy London guest editing the Guardian's Comment is Free on Tuesday and a conference with reps from many of the UK occupations this weekend. >> On Tuesday, the press team intends to hold a press briefing so that the media can hear our view of what Occupy London has been up to in its first month and what we've got planned in the near future. Not holding an event like this will make us hostage to the dominant media narative ("but what are you lot asking for...?") and we feel it is important that Occupy writes its own history. >> All being well, we will be holding this briefing at 10am at the Tent City University at OLSX. >> As such: >> Press briefing - We'd very much like to invite a representative from each working group to give a short (1-2 minutes) update at this briefing. The overall format for this will be intro from press team, updates from working groups, Q&A from media followed by 121 interviews. > Press release - the press team is about to start working on a press release that will be provided to media at this event and then sent out to the wider media list afterwards. For this we would like to get a 50-100 word update from working groups about what they've been up to. > Video/pictures - If you have any pictures or video that can also be used to illustrate what you've been up to do send those through too. >> If you can send through your updates to press at occupylsx.org that would be great. If a representative from a group cannot attend, we will get someone to read the written update you've provided. By the way, we apologise for the early start, but it will mean that we get maxumum press coverage for this event. >> Also, please do send this on to anyone that you think might not be on the list. >> Any queries, do call me on 07745 651634. >> Cheers, > Ro >
Personal Statement from Anne Greig Page 1(PDF) Personal Statement from Anne Greig Page 2(PDF)
Picture: Sylvia Major, one of Hollie’s alleged abusers, the woman who was so ‘traumatized’ by Robert Green’s election leaflets that she complained to Grampian Police and gave evidence at his trial, the woman who confirmed under oath that she was never interviewed by police over Hollie’s allegations, yet was able to travel over 700 miles to London to take the seat immediately behind Hollie in the court to intimidate her. Hollie was visibly terrified when she saw her.
Synopsis of Court of Appeal Hearing – 2 March 2012
The 20 minute hearing in front of Lord Justice Thorpe on 27 October 2011 was adjourned to be listed for half a day in front of 3 Lord Justices. The purpose of the adjournment was to enable the Appellant, Anne, to seek professional legal representation.
A solicitor and barrister were instructed, and they advised that it was necessary to reduce the original argument to a discrete point of law being;
Was it “necessary” for the Court to intervene in Hollie’s life?
Ian Wise QC submitted to the 3 Lord Justices that the evidence provided by Shropshire Council, in their application to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of the Court, which is available to protect vulnerable members of society, was scant and contradicted their argument that Hollie was being coerced using undue influence.
He asked for permission to appeal the decision of Mrs Justice Pauffley, to make Anne and Robert subject to Injunctions threatening prison if they took Hollie to further public meetings. Mrs Justice Pauffley also invited the Official Solicitor to represent Hollie, and to make enquiries into whether Hollie has capacity to litigate or consent to the campaign, by instructing a disputed psychiatrist.
Ian Wise QC advanced the case that Mrs Justice Pauffley didn’t put her mind to whether Hollie’s involvement in the campaign was the result of coercion and undue influence allowing her to invoke her inherent powers and Hollie being “vulnerable” was not enough to invoke the inherent jurisdiction due to the doctrine of necessity.
The question that the Court of Appeal was essentially asked was this:
“Does the evidence provided by Shropshire Council demonstrate that it is Hollie’s choice to demand justice through campaigning in which case the Court has no jurisdiction, or is the campaign exploiting Hollie, thereby invoking a NEED for the Court to invoke it’s inherent powers to protect?”
The Court of Appeal decided that the question was not one for the Court of Appeal to answer. They decided that the matter ought properly be tried in the lower court in secrecy. The Judges agreed that the Court had rightly drawn inferences that Hollie needed protection because her mother had not co-operated with Shropshire Council in their investigation into Hollie’s ability to consent to the campaign.
Anne had simply made the same submission as Ian Wise QC – There is no case to answer!
As a result of Mrs Justice Pauffley’s orders, and the refusal of the Court of Appeal to intervene, Anne is now guilty of exploiting Hollie until she is able to prove her innocence in a secret Court, where the evidence is controlled by the Local Authority and Official Solicitor and experts are not agreed.
Since the public Court of Appeal refuses to hear the evidence relating to whether it is Hollie’s choice to campaign, should we draw inferences about the secrecy ordered? Are the Courts protecting Hollie or are they protecting the Paedophiles who abused Hollie?
One very clear point made by Ian Wise QC when referring to the medical evidence exhibited to Shropshire Council’s statement was Hollie’s story is real and when Hollie is away from her mother she goes into a state of panic.
It was also made clear that Hollie is presumed to have capacity unless medical evidence proves otherwise. In this case the presumption of capacity still exists.
The Court of Protection invariably remove vulnerable people from their carers, on accusations that the state will take better care of them. What could frighten Hollie more than the prospect of being taken from her mother, into the care of state officials? Especially as Hollie has not fully recovered from when she was abused by social workers, police, a judge and others while living in Scotland.
The concern is that the secrecy of the lower court will allow Judges to make perverse “findings” based upon biased expert reports as often happens in the secret family courts which remove thousands of children from their families each year. The Court of Appeal decision means that it is perfectly lawful for anyone to be declared as not having capacity in the interim, on the allegation of a Local Authority, without any supporting evidence.
Once declared to not have capacity to litigate during proceedings forced upon you, you lose your legal identity which is taken over by the official solicitor. You can no longer choose your own representation, or complain, consent, withhold consent, request your records, withhold your records, make choices, and most importantly psychiatric assessment can be forced on you.
If the psychiatrist you never consented to reports that you do not have capacity to make decisions, your life belongs to the government and they will decide where you live, whether you are drugged, locked up for life, removed from your family – and all this happens in secrecy, with the threat of imprisonment if anyone dares tell the story of what happened in the secret court.
Of course Ian Wise QC could not imply that the Secret Court was a potentially corrupt Court and therefore did not address the Court of Appeal with the argument that Hollie’s case needs to be heard in open court in order to protect her from unjustified state intervention.
Hollie has had enough of secrets! Hollie demands justice.
Belinda Mckenzie talks to Mark Windows from landofthefree outside The Royal Courts of Justice following the latest in the Hollie Greig case. Thanks to Chris and Primrose for helping out.
Brian Gerrish’s reaction to the Judgement by the Royal Courts of Justice against Hollie Greig. Bill Maloney asking the questions.
This post has no tag
Permanent link to this article: http://news.truthjuice.co.uk/index.php/2012/03/hollie-greig-court-appeal-3rd-of-march-2012/